Ealing Council inadvertently failed to keep their own residents safe and well in their homes was never a top priority for them in reference on the housing disrepair. There was a case study example that Errol Baptiste the resident have to live with housing disrepair in his home for more than 35 months since November 2021, and the Council offered no feeble defence which they did not reply to the Local Democracy Reporting Service on the case in their failure to deal with the housing disrepair inside Mr Baptiste’s home.
Ealing Council are still using the pandemic of March 2020 and November 2021, failing to provide Errol Baptiste the resident a high standards of service have breach parts on the 56 rules of law in relation to the housing disrepair. Ealing Council did not try to provide the best possible service to Mr Baptiste in his case on the housing disrepair for over 35 months and failing to deal with the Rat Infestations for over 32 months since June 15, 2022, breach the Prevention of Damage by Pests Act 1949.
Why did Ealing Council took more than 32 months to deal with Rodent Infestations by taking service measures to make improvements relating to the housing disrepair? Ealing Council breaches Information Management did not considered Errol Baptiste’s vulnerabilities by committing abuse had breached the Data Protection Act 2018, Section 45, Section 94, and GDPR 2018, Article 15. Ealing Council committed safeguarding offences by keeping Mr Baptiste in Unsafe Accommodation as Prejudicial to Health under Section 82 of the Magistrates Court Act 1980 and Environmental Protection Act 1990.
https://www.uk.news.yahoo.com>live-squalor-mould-rats-council-06000003.html
https://www.inkl.com/glance/news/it-s-like-living-in-a-victorian-slum-te…
Media Contact:
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Boston New Times journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
